|
MEOR Tax Incentives & Advantages >>
| Fiscal Year 2011 Revenue Proposal |
| H.R. 611 - Marginal Well Preservation & Enhancement Act
|
|
S.286 - Marginal Well Preservation & Enhancement Act
|
The promise of incremental oil production offered by successful MEOR projects continues to fire the imagination and excite the curiosity of major and independent oil producers a like. In order to be successful, an MEOR project should properly screen and thoroughly evaluate the candidate wells and reservoirs to identify the production problem or problems, and then devise the proper MEOR approach to address them. The ultimate success of your MEOR program depends upon how carefully it is structured and implemented. A lease management approach will look to optimize your MEOR program for total oil & gas production while taking full advantage of existing tax law.
In past years tax incentives and advantages for Enhanced Recovery Projects (EOR) were not overlooked. Qualified
enhanced oil recovery projects have been afforded special tax consideration at the local, state and Federal levels for many years. Savvy oil producers
incorporated EOR / MEOR strategies into their overall lease management program to take full advantage of the then existing tax law and thereby maximize profitability.
This may soon change! The President agreed at the G-20 Summit in Pittsburgh to phase out subsidies for fossil fuels so that the United States can transition to a 21st century energy economy. The credit, like other oil and gas preferences the Administration proposes to repeal, distorts markets by encouraging more investment in the oil and gas industry than would occur under a neutral system. To the extent the credit encourages overproduction of oil, it is detrimental to long-term energy security and is also inconsistent with the Administration’s policy of reducing carbon emissions and encouraging the use of renewable energy sources. Moreover, the credit must ultimately be financed with taxes that result in underinvestment in other, potentially more productive, areas of the economy.
It remains to be seen if the existing standard for Qualification at the State Level will be maintained. This standard in the form of a Federal Mandate, required Governors in each oil producing state to designate an appropriate State agency to process and rule on applications involving requests for EOR / Tertiary Recovery project status. Understandably, the various state
jurisdictional agencies have followed the Federal guidelines for defining and qualifying such projects. MEOR, which
once was a 'black hole' in most oil producing states, has recently emerged to be recognized as a proven tertiary recovery
process.
The qualification process varies from state to state. Typically, a formal filing and request for tertiary qualification is made
with the State Corporation Commission, or in Texas, the Railroad Commission. The oil producer must show that the project
is designed to improve oil recovery, its designated area boundary, and that it is a new project. The services of a petroleum
engineer can be most helpful in the qualification process. Once qualified, a tertiary project is often afforded tax considerations
at the State, and often County level.
In Kansas from in 1991-1992, for example, the savings on State Severance Taxes alone amounted to $1,500 to $1,700 per well per year!
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HOME | RAM History | FAQ's | Contact Us |